The 5 Finest Linux Video Editors of 2019

With the dawn of YouTube (along with other social media services), the requirement to make quality movies has increased exponentially. For consumers around the HD VFX and Windows environments, understanding what resources are available is rather simple.

But for Linux users, these options may not be so evident. To this end, we have gathered together our five leading video editors to the Linux platform. All of those selected choices are free, open source, and easily available for setup.


OpenShot is a non-linear, multi-track movie editor which provides one of the very shallow learning curves of almost any editor that you could possibly use. The port is incredibly well made and the attribute set is rather extensive. Contained from this box, you will get a vast array of supported video/audio/image formats (like 4K video service ), curve-based keyframe cartoons, incorporated desktop drag and drop, unlimited paths and layers, clip resizing/scaling/trimming/snapping/rotation/cutting, easy-to-create adjustments, real time previews, compositing, image overlays, watermarks, name templates, keying, effects, and even more.

OpenShot is regarded as an all-purpose movie editor and will serve your ordinary editing requirements. Should you want more intricate editing tools, then OpenShot may fail you. But as a result of this ease-of-use linked with this particular tool, it’s perfectly suited for anyone who have little to no experience with the job of editing. And for anyone seeking to have the ability to incorporate animated transitions and titles, you will be amazed by the quality and ease of use of the included tools. The 1 caveat to incorporating animations is that a number of the more complex clips may take some time to render.

Since OpenShot is located from the typical repositories, installing OpenShot is as straightforward as launching your distribution’s program shop, hunting for OpenShot, and clicking install. OpenShot may also be conducted as an AppImage. To accomplish this, download the AppImage file, give it executable permissions (using the control chmod u+x OpenShot-*.AppImage), and then run the file using the control . / / OpenShot-*.AppImage.


What We Like

One of the easiest to find video editors on the market.
Clean and user friendly interface.
Outstanding group of titles and transitions.
Supports a high number of audio, video, and image formats.
Outstanding export attribute (can export into many different formats).
Can be run as an AppImage.

What We Don’t Like

Depends upon Blender and could be a little finicky because of this.
Some animated names may take a lengthy time to leave.
Cannot manage more elaborate edits.
Random crashes could be experienced.
Animated names can split if Blender is not upgraded alongside OpenShot.
Video import could be slow.
Not professional tier.


Kdenlive was created out of the KDE project and is among the greatest open source options to iMovie. Therefore, if you are migrating from macOS, that is exactly what you desire. Much like OpenShot, Kdenlive is a all-purpose, multi-track, non-linear video editor which supports a broad array of video, sound, and image formats. Contrary to OpenShot, Kdenlive delivers a customizable design, which means that you may make the process better match your requirements. Kdenlive also offers the capability to produce tiles using images and texts, built-in effects and transitions, video and audio dividers for footage equilibrium, proxy editing, autosave, keyframable effects, plus even more.

Just like OpenShot, Kdenlive may be set up in the normal repositories, therefore all you need to do is open your supply’s app shop, hunt for Kdenlive, and click on install.

What We Like

Easy to use interface.
Wide assortment of document format support.
Customizable interface.
Fast video export.

What We Don’t Like

No animated names contained.
Can be slow to process video.
Depends upon several KDE libraries.
Not professional tier.


In certain respects, Shotcut could be set on precisely the exact same playing field as both OpenShot and Kdenlive. But, Shotcut is somewhat more complex than the other two. Much like OpenShot, Shotcut does attributes support for 4K video, so if you’re searching for a greater resolution undertaking, with more innovative features, Shotcut may be your very best option. The characteristic set for Shotcut comprises broad assortment of video/audio/image formats, including native deadline editing, supports different resolutions and framerate clips in one endeavor, sound filters and effects, video adjustments and filters, multitrack timeline, infinite redo/undo, clip resizing/scaling/trimming/snapping/rotation/cutting, outside screen support, plus a whole lot more. Though Shotcut cannot be found from the typical repositories, it may be utilized as an AppImage (download the essential file in the Shotcut download webpage , give it the appropriate permissions, and run the executable file ).

The biggest caveat to Shotcut is your learning curve. You wont find this instrument to be as straightforward as OpenShot or even Kdenlive, but there are loads of video tutorials that will assist you on the way.


What We Like

Efficient video processing.
Some built-in effects and alterations.
4K support.
Built-in audio mixing.
Native deadline editing (no movie import required ).

What We Don’t Like

Steeper learning curve.
Audio may find a little complicated.
Not professional tier.


Flowblade is just another multitrack, non-linear video editor available for Linux. The Flowblade interface is similar in design to OpenShot, as is the characteristic collection. Among the highlights of Flowblade is that the comprised, extension filter collection (for movie, sound, and graphics ). Much like OpenShot, Flowblade concentrates on ease-of-use, which means that you won’t find a terribly steep learning curve. Flowblade’s feature set contains the likes of drag and drop support, proxy editing, big assortment of supported video/audio/image formats, batch making, watermarks, video transitions, and much more.

Flowblade was written in Python, which means you may locate that the program responds quicker than OpenShot and Kdenlive. Flowblade can also be available from the normal repositories, therefore installation only needs you open your supply’s app shop, hunting for Flowblade, and clicking setup.


What We Like

Simple interface.
Shallow learning curve.
Large Number of filters.
Bins to keep track of job files.
Fast video file archiving.

What We Don’t Like

Lack of animated names.
Not professional tier.


If you’re searching for absolute simplicity, VidCutter is exactly what you desire. This specific tool really just does one thing: divide and combine videos. You will not be incorporating effects, alterations, or anything elaborate. And unlike any programs listed here, VidCutter doesn’t incorporate a multitrack, non-linear timeline. In reality, you receive one monitor and that is it.

However, when you just must cut a clip, then you do not need to bother with all of the bells and whistles. Though Vidcutter does support the majority of the frequent file formats, it’s somewhat picky about framerate, so if you are filming 30 fps on a GoPro, you may end up out of luck with all the import. VidCutter does contain a handy SmartClip attribute, making it very easy for you to pick the section of the clip that you need to cut. If you’re searching for a video editor which can work with numerous monitors and do elaborate transitions and animations, then VidCutter isn’t the instrument for you. If you’re trying to find the capacity to splice a few clips together, this is exactly what you’re searching for.

VidCutter Cannot Be seen from the conventional repositories, so You’ll Have to add it with the following commands (on Ubuntu or alternative Debian-based distributions):

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ozmartian/apps
Sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get set up vidcutter

What We Like

Incredibly Easy to Use.
Great tool for splitting and merging clips.
Small footprint (does not occupy much hard-disk distance ).

What We Don’t Like

Limited in scope.
Not professional tier.